In-vitro validation of coronary physiology assessment with 5 French guiding catheters.

BACKGROUND: The trans-radial approach for cardiac catheterization led to an increasing adoption of 5 French (F) catheters. We aim to evaluate reliability and reproducibility of coronary physiology assessment performed with 5F guiding catheter (GC). METHODS: Physiological measurements were performed in a coronary flow simulator, which provides two pulsatile flows, the baseline and hyperaemic flows. Two screws, positioned proximally and distally to the distal sensor of a pressure-temperature guidewire, were used to determine various combinations of stenoses and distal obstructions, simulating different pathophysiological conditions. For each setting, 5 measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were performed with 6F and 5F GCs. RESULTS: A total amount of 190 measurements were performed, 95 with 6F GC and 95 with 5F GC. Minimal differences between 6F and 5F GCs were detected for FFR [0.91 (IQR: 0.87-0.94) and 0.87 (IQR: 0.82-0.92) respectively, p < 0.001] and IMR (16.5 ± 8.8 and 15.4 ± 8.3 respectively, p = 0.001). Mean CFR was comparable between 6F and 5F GCs (3.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 0.7 respectively, p = 0.38). Misclassification rates were 1.0 %, 1.0 % and 0 % for FFR, CFR and IMR, respectively. According to Passing-Bablok analysis, an excellent agreement between 6F and 5F GCs was demonstrated for FFR and IMR, and a modest agreement for CFR. All measurements with 5F GC showed high reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In our in-vitro model, a complete physiological assessment including FFR, CFR and IMR resulted substantially comparable between 6F and 5F GCs. Further in-vivo analysis is required to support these findings.

Prevalence of Collateral Typology in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion and Its Impact on Percutaneous Intervention Performance.

The presence of collateral channels providing distal blood supply is a distinctive characteristic of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. However, data about the distinct baseline and procedural characteristics of each collateral subset are scarce. Accordingly, we sought to explore the procedural aspects specific for each collateral typology (ipsilateral collaterals [ICs], contralateral collaterals [CCs] or mixed) in CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A retrospective analysis of our CTO-PCI registry was performed to investigate the prevalence, procedural characteristics, and outcomes specific for each CTO-PCI subset, defined according to the inter-arterial connection anatomy. A total of 209 cases were included. Of the included cases, 45 (22%) and 92 (44%) patients displayed solely IC or CC, respectively, whereas in 72 (34%) both IC and CC were present (mixed). The procedural success rate was high (91.1%) and comparable among the different groups, despite greater lesion complexity in the CC group. The most frequent target vessel was the left circumflex in the IC group (51% of cases) and the right coronary artery in the CC (63%) and mixed (57%) groups. Among the IC cases, 42% showed a poor collateral connection function (2% and 10% for the CC and mixed group, respectively), and 46% showed a suboptimal collateral recipient artery filling (21% and 20% for the CC and mixed group, respectively). Most of the IC cases were performed using a single access (96%). In conclusion, the success and complication rates were comparable among the collateral typology groups, irrespective of the differences in the baseline and procedural characteristics. Phenotyping CTO as hereby proposed might be helpful for targeted procedural considerations.

Minimalistic Hybrid Approach for the Percutaneous Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: Midterm Follow-Up of an International Multicenter Cohort.

The minimalistic hybrid approach (MHA) is a recently proposed algorithm to perform chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), reducing the overall invasiveness of the procedure without impacting the acute results. However, data on midterm results are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcomes of a multicenter international cohort of CTO PCI treated according to the MHA. Data from a consecutive series of patients with a CTO who underwent PCI according to the MHA between February 2019 and March 2022 were prospectively collected in 3 European centers and retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite outcome of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, at the last follow-up available. A total of 212 patients were included. The majority of the patients were symptomatic for angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 2 or 3: 63.7%) at the time of the index procedure. The mean Japanese-CTO and CASTLE scores were 2.1 ± 1.2 and 2.0 ± 1.3, respectively. Technical success (CTO open with optimal flow) was achieved in 198 patients (93.9%) and procedural success (technical success without in-hospital MACEs) in 195 (91.9%). At the last follow-up available (median 677 days), the cumulative incidence rate of MACEs was 11.5%; in particular, all-cause death was 7.4%, any myocardial infarction was 4.3%, and unplanned target vessel revascularization was 6.5%. In conclusion, the midterm results of the MHA seem to be in line with contemporary results of other CTO PCI algorithms, thus potentially validating the MHA as a valuable alternative, provided that interventionalists are already expert CTO operators and accustomed to the definitions and peculiarities of MHA.

Alternative (Transulnar or Distal Radial) Arterial Access for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Subanalysis from the Minimalistic Hybrid Approach Algorithm Registry).

The transradial approach (TRA) has become the primary choice for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, it may not be always feasible because of clinical and/or technical challenges. Alternative forearm accesses, such as transulnar approach (TUA) and distal radial approach (dTRA) may allow maintaining a wrist approach for the procedure, avoiding the femoral artery. This issue is particularly relevant in patients who underwent multiple revascularizations, such as those with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of TUA and/or dTRA is comparable with TRA in CTO PCI using a minimalistic hybrid approach algorithm, which limits the number of accesses used to minimize vascular access complications. Patients with CTO PCI treated solely through a fully alternative approach (TUA and/or dTRA) were compared with those treated solely through a standard TRA approach. The primary efficacy end point was procedural success, whereas the primary safety end point was the composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events and vascular complications. Of 201 CTO PCIs attempted, 154 procedures were considered for analysis (standard, n = 104, alternative, n = 50). Alternative and standard groups demonstrated comparable rates of both procedural success (92% vs 94.2%, p = 0.70) and primary safety end point (4.8% vs 6.0%, p = 0.70). Of interest, 7 French guiding catheters were more frequently used in the alternative group (44% vs 26%, p = 0.028). In conclusion, CTO PCI after minimalistic hybrid approach by way of alternative forearm vascular accesses (dTRA and/or TUA) is feasible and safe to perform, compared with CTO PCI by way of standard TRA.

Percutaneous treatment of left circumflex coronary artery injury related to mitral valve surgery: Case series and systematic review of the literature.

Left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) injury related to mitral valve surgery is a rare complication. The best treatment option is not defined, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may represent an effective treatment to avoid prolonged myocardial ischemia. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of PCI treatment, all records of LCx injury related to mitral valve surgery and treated with PCI were included after a systematic PubMed searching. Moreover, we retrospectively analyzed our single-center PCI database and patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. Patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve intervention, non-mitral valve surgery, conservatively or surgically treated after LCx injury were excluded. Data about patient characteristics, procedural details, PCI success, and in-hospital mortality were collected. Fifty-six patients were included, 58.9% were male (n = 33) and the median age was 60.5 years (IQR = 21.75). The majority had left dominant or codominant coronary system (62.2%, n = 28 and 15.6%, n = 7, respectively). Clinical manifestations ranged from hemodynamic stability (21.1%, n = 8) to hemodynamic instability (42.1%, n = 16) and cardiac arrest (18.4%, n = 7). On ECG, 23.5% of patients (n = 12) presented ST-segment depression, 58.8% (n = 30) ST-segment elevation, 7.8% (n = 4) atrioventricular block, and 29.4% (n = 15) ventricular arrhythmias. Left ventricle dysfunction was present in 52.3% (n = 22) of patients and wall motion abnormalities in 71.4% (n = 30). PCI success rate was 82.1% (n = 46) and in-hospital mortality 4.5% (n = 2). LCx injury related to mitral surgery is a rare complication characterized by an increased risk of mortality. PCI seems a feasible treatment option, still burdened by suboptimal results, probably related to the technical challenges posed by the surgical failure.

Nurse-led care after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The added value of advanced practitioner nurse (APN) care after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. The present study investigates the impact of APN-led care on AF recurrence, patient knowledge, lifestyle, and patient satisfaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively randomized to usual care (N = 33) or intervention (N = 32) group. In addition to usual care, the intervention consisted of an educational session, three consultations spread over 6 months and telephone accessibility coordinated by the APN. Primary outcome was the AF recurrence rate at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were lifestyle factors (alcohol intake, exercise, BMI, smoking), patient satisfaction and AF knowledge measured at 1 and 6 months between groups and within each group. Study demographics at 1 month were similar, except AF knowledge was higher in the intervention group (8.6 vs. 7, P = 0.001). At 6 months, AF recurrence was significantly lower in the intervention group (13.5 vs. 39.4%, P = 0.014). Between groups, patient satisfaction and AF knowledge were significantly higher in the intervention group, respectively, 9.4 vs. 8.7 (P < 0.001) and 8.6 vs. 7.0 out of 10 (P < 0.001). Within the intervention group, alcohol intake decreased from 3.9 to 2.6 units per week (P = 0.031) and physical activity increased from 224.4 ± 210.7 to 283.8 ± 169.3 (P = 0.048). No changes occurred within the usual care group. Assignment to the intervention group was the only protective factor for AF recurrence [Exp(B) 0.299, P = 0.04] in multivariable-adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: Adding APN-led care after ablation of AF improves short-term clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and physical activity and decreases alcohol intake.

The present study investigates the added value of advanced practitioner nurse (APN)-led care consisting of an educational session, three consultations spread over 6 months and telephone accessibility coordinated by the APN in patients after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Main findings are The addition of nurse-led care after ablation of AF improves short-term clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and physical activity and decreases alcohol intake.Our study shows that integrating nurse-led care in the post-AF ablation setting is a relatively simple to implement, low-cost intervention with a major impact on patient outcomes and quality of care. These findings encourage including nurse-led care into routine AF ablation follow-up.

A glimpse into the future of the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO PCI) is one of the most challenging but rewarding procedures in the portfolio of interventional cardiologists. Several challenges, however, still must be overcome and many questions need to be answered. After coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), disease of the conduits and concomitant progression of atherosclerotic disease to CTO of the subtended native coronary vessels are common and associated with onset of new anginal symptoms and worsening of the prognosis. Which is the best strategy for these post-CABG CTOs? Furthermore, what is the role of physiology in the setting of CTO PCI? In the last decades, many researchers tried to demystify the complex maze but technical limitations and the demanding procedure itself, for both the patient and the operator, do not allow extensive investigation of its impact on clinical practice. Can we enhance periprocedural planning of CTO PCI with a more tailored and multidimensional evaluation? Analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scans is getting more and more incorporated into the clinical routine and training of interventional cardiologists but mainly focuses on structural valvular disease. Nevertheless, with the appropriate expertise, a lot of information can be derived for coronary intervention to improve procedural planning and potentially outcomes. Finally, in the era of drug-eluting stent, is there a place for strategies that minimize metal implantation in the coronaries to further reduce late-onset adverse events in CTO PCI? This approach could be attractive in CTOs due to the higher risk of target vessel failure and revascularization shown in literature but, at the same time, more challenging due to the histological and anatomical complexity of the disease. In this review, we aim to tackle these questions and concomitantly provide a vision of potential future application of new techniques and technology in CTO PCI that could allow further advancement in this field.

Clinical implications of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease and role of the thermodilution method.

More than 60% of patients undergoing coronary angiography present no coronary artery disease (CAD). Angina and myocardial ischemia are classically determined by epicardial vascular obstruction, but coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) may also represent a possible cause for these phenomena. Two endotypes of CMD have been recognized, with two different pathophysiological mechanisms: structural CMD, characterized by low coronary flow reserve (CFR) and high microvascular resistance (MVR) values; and functional CMD, characterized by low CFR and normal MVR values. According to the present data, almost half of patients with non-obstructive CAD have shown signs of CMD. For this reason, further investigations for microvascular function assessment should be considered when evaluating no-CAD patients complaining of angina or presenting signs of myocardial ischemia. The thermodilution method is currently becoming a widespread invasive technique due to its feasibility and high reproducibility for coronary physiology evaluation. Furthermore, a recently introduced technique - called continuous thermodilution - allows for direct measurement of absolute coronary flow and resistances. The role of this brand-new technique in the clinical scenario is however still to be fully investigated and its use is at present limited to research purposes only. Among no-CAD patients, both structural and functional CMD are related to a worse prognosis in term of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In this review, we will discuss the present evidence supporting the definition, prevalence and clinical implication of the different forms of CMD and the technical aspects of its invasive assessment.

Applicability of the EXCEL Trial Criteria to an All-Comers Real-World Cohort of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The Evaluation of XIENCE versus EXCEL (Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) trial is the largest randomized study comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents and bypass surgery in unprotected left main disease (ULMD). Our aim was to assess which proportion of patients from a contemporary all-comer population of ULMD PCI would be eligible for the EXCEL trial and whether these patients show different long-term outcomes than the rest of the ULMD population. A total of 246 consecutive patients underwent ULMD PCI between January 2018 and December 2021 and were retrospectively analyzed. After application of the EXCEL trial inclusion and exclusion criteria, 98 patients (39%) were allocated to the "EXCEL-like" cohort and 148 to the "non-EXCEL-like." Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were substantially comparable. The mean baseline SYNTAX score was lower in the EXCEL-like patients than the non-EXCEL-like group (20.1 ± 7.1 vs 23.0 ± 11.2, p = 0.025), with the latter also showing a higher degree of incomplete revascularization (residual SYNTAX score >8 : 11% vs 26%, p = 0.005). At 1 year, the cumulative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events rate was 7% for the EXCEL-like and 17% for the non-EXCEL-like patients, respectively (p = 0.03). At the last follow-up available, the significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events rate persisted (19% vs 37%, p = 0.02) and a significant difference in any unplanned revascularization was also shown (1.5% vs 13%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, in a contemporary real-world cohort of ULMD PCI, only a minority of patients could be enrolled in the EXCEL trial; the EXCEL-like patients, in our population, showed less clinical events at long-term follow-up than the cohort of patients who were ineligible for EXCEL, despite comparable baseline cardiovascular profiles; these findings may challenge a broad external applicability of the results of the EXCEL trial in routine clinical activity.

Feasibility, safety and predictors of a successful "blind wiring" antegrade approach in the percutaneous treatment of chronic coronary total occlusions.

BACKGROUND: Antegrade wiring using only antegrade guiding catheter without contralateral injection (defined as "blind antegrade wiring") may represent a valid initial treatment strategy for selected chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs) due to the potentially lower risk of vascular complications. A careful selection of lesions eligible for this strategy as well as an accurate balance between the likelihood of success and failure is paramount. The aim of the study is to determine the rate of successful revascularization, the potential predictors of failure and the incidence of major complications, when using a "blind antegrade wiring" technique. METHODS: In this multicentric study, consecutive patients with CTO undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively screened. All cases approached using "blind antegrade wiring" technique were included. RESULTS: Out of 155 consecutive CTO-PCIs, 94 involved initial "blind antegrade wiring" strategy. Successful revascularization by means of "blind antegrade wiring" technique was achieved in 73 (78%) patients. Final successful revascularization was obtained in 19 of the remaining 21 procedures with "blind antegrade wiring" failure using other techniques (by adding a second contralateral guiding catheter; 98% total successful revascularization). Logistic regression analysis identified higher J-CTO Score as the only predictor of "blind antegrade wiring" failure. One complication occurred (wire-based coronary perforation). CONCLUSIONS: "Blind antegrade wiring" may be considered as initial strategy for selected CTO-PCI, mainly for CTOs with low J-CTO Score. This strategy would allow in a substantial number of cases to avoid a priori dual injection, keeping it as secondary strategy in case of "blind antegrade wiring" failure.

Trends and outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Belgium: a 13-year single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been adopted as an alternative to surgery in severe aortic stenosis treatment, even in low-intermediate risk. The aim of this study is to retrospectively report our single-centre 13-year TAVI experience with emphasis on learning curve, referral indication and trends in outcomes over time. METHODS: We included 361 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from January 2008 to December 2020, grouped according to similar per-year volume of procedures: G1 (2008-2014), G2 (2015-2017) and G3 (2018-2020). RESULTS: The number of procedures increased (group size: 59 vs. 106 vs. 196). No major differences were observed in STS-PROM and EuroSCORE-II between groups, despite TAVI in patients with prior surgical revascularisation was mainly performed in G1. Trans-femoral approach raised from 80.8 to 93.4%, while the most common alternative access was trans-subclavian. The pre-dilation rate was higher in G1 with lower prosthesis post-dilation rate. The length of hospital stay decreased in time by 30%. At 30 days a reduction in all-cause mortality, vascular complications, bleedings and para-valvular leak combined with higher rate of permanent pacing were observed over the groups. At 1-year there was no difference in all-cause mortality but over 30% reduction in cardiovascular death (8.5 vs. 7.5 vs. 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Favourable trends were observed across the groups, with an improvement in periprocedural outcomes and cardiovascular mortality at 1-year. These improvements could depend on increased expertise because mortality reduction was noted only after reaching a significant procedure volume. A trend towards lower risk patients selection was present in our cohort, as previously described worldwide.

Minimalistic hybrid approach for the percutaneous treatment of chronic coronary total occlusions: An in-depth analysis of the whole algorithm.

INTRODUCTION: The minimalistic hybrid approach (MHA) is an algorithm to perform chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current study aims to evaluate the distribution of patients among the five different treatment strategies, the different techniques used in each strategy, the overall procedural success, and the safety of the MHA algorithm. METHODS: Data from a consecutive series of patients with a CTO who underwent elective PCI between February 2019 and July 2021 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three CTOPCI in 135 patients were approached according to the MHA algorithm: 134 CTO (93.7%) were successfully recanalized and 9 procedures failed. About half of the procedures (48.3%) were approached using strategy A: antegrade "blind wiring" with contralateral retrograde options, making this the most popular strategy. A total of 89 procedures (62.2%) were completed with a single guiding catheter; in 86 (96.6%) a forearm approach was used. The remaining 54 cases were performed with dual access; in the majority of these patients (90.7%), a bilateral forearm approach was used. The only reason to use the femoral access was inadequate forearm access. One hundred and fifty-four out of 197 (78.2%) access sites were 6 French sheaths. CONCLUSION: MHA is a stepwise approach focused on the forearm approach to reduce the number of access sites and catheter size used in CTOPCI while maintaining proficiency and safety. Operators should be warned that this approach should be adopted only by experienced CTO operators who master all the strategies of the classic hybrid algorithm and the forearm approach.

Comparison of Different Stenting Techniques in Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess which bifurcation technique performs best in unprotected left-main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Provisional stenting was considered the preferred technique for LM bifurcation PCI due to the supposed lower risks of thrombosis and restenosis. However, recent studies showed potential advantages of double kissing (DK)-crush technique over the other strategies. METHODS: We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis comparing different stenting techniques in the setting of LM bifurcation. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized clinical trials were considered eligible for inclusion. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were computed using a random-effects model for death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis, including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (2364 patients) were included. Compared with provisional stenting, DK-crush was associated with fewer cardiac deaths (IRR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17-0.70; P<.01), myocardial infarctions (IRR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44; P<.001), stent thromboses (IRR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.69; P<.01), target-vessel revascularizations (IRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.46; P<.001), and target-lesion revascularizations (IRR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.46; P<.001). DK-crush was also associated with a lower risk of myocardial infarction (IRR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.76; P=.02) when compared with standard crush and lower risk of target-lesion revascularization when compared with culotte (IRR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.83; P=.02) and crush (IRR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.28; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: DK-crush is the best technique for unprotected LM bifurcation PCI.

A prospective evaluation of a redefined version of the "minimalistic hybrid approach" algorithm for percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study is to prospectively assess the feasibility of the "Minimalistic Hybrid Approach" (MHA) algorithm for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: We recently described the MHA, with focus on the classic hybrid strategies (antegrade wire escalation [AWE] or retrograde wire escalation [RWE], antegrade dissection-re-entry [ADR] or retrograde dissection-re-entry [RDR]), and also on access site (favoring "wrist" approach: radial, ulnar, and distal radial), introducer French size (favoring 6 French catheters) and nonroutine initial use of dual injection. METHODS: The MHA was prospectively attempted in 56 consecutive CTO PCI in 54 patients. Technical success was defined as the achievement of TIMI 3 antegrade flow with residual stenosis <30%, procedural success was defined as technical success without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Mean Japanese-CTO (J-CTO) score was 2.04 ± 0.95(J-CTO score ≥ 3 in 30.4%). The lesion-based technical and procedural success were 94.6%(53/56:three failures, two in the same patient) and 91.1%(51/56:three failures, one tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis and one periprocedural infarction), the patient-based successes were: technical 98.1%(53/54) and procedural 94.4%(51/54). In 34 procedures (60.7%), the approach was single catheter (always trans-wrist besides one femoral). Out of the 22(39.3%) lesions approached with dual catheters, one was bi-femoral, the rest was bi-wrist. In 29 cases (51.8%) AWE represented the successful technique, ADR in 5(8.9%) and retrograde in 19(33.9%); 3(5.4%) were failures. CONCLUSIONS: The current study shows that the MHA algorithm is feasible in almost every CTO lesion and it can lead to extremely successful results once applied by operators well acquainted with the wrist approach and with established experience using the full spectrum of the hybrid algorithm techniques.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in young female acute coronary syndrome patients: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an unusual cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), rapidly gaining recognition over the last decade. SCAD occurs predominantly in young, otherwise healthy women and coronary angiogram often lacks typical (atherosclerotic) features. Therefore, SCAD remains notably underdiagnosed. As optimal treatment strategy differs greatly from atherosclerotic ACS, early (differential) diagnosis is crucial. PURPOSE/METHODS: In this paper, all coronary angiograms performed for ACS in women up to 50 years of age were retrospectively reviewed by three independent interventional cardiologists. RESULTS: The obtained insights are comparable to recent literature. SCAD incidence was 26% in this cohort. Left anterior descending coronary artery was the main affected vessel with SCAD subtype 2B as predominant angiographic presentation. Correct diagnosis during index procedure was poor with only 33% accuracy. Nevertheless, a favourable trend over time was noted. Percutaneous coronary intervention success was 56%, as in 44% of patients initial stenting was complicated by progressive dissection. Overall, outcome was excellent with no reported fatalities. CONCLUSION: SCAD remains an underdiagnosed subtype of ACS and the importance of increasing awareness amongst (interventional) cardiologists needs to be emphasised.

Coronary sinus anatomical features: Description and procedural implications during coronary sinus Reducer implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that some coronary sinus (CS) anatomies allow a more straightforward CS Reducer (CSR) implantation. BACKGROUND: Recent decades have seen a rise in patients with chronic angina. When complete revascularization and maximal medical therapy fail to reduce symptoms, CSR has become a new therapeutic option. METHODS: We identified a classical C-shape-a near horizontal course of the proximal portion of a circular CS-in a retrospective analysis of 47 CSR implantations and compared the procedural time, fluoroscopic time, contrast use, presence of valves or bifurcations and procedural complications with the non-C-shape CS anatomy. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in procedural (20.0 [19.0-24.7] min vs. 24.5 [20.7-51.0] min; p = .028 and fluoroscopic time (9.5 [7.5-14.5] min vs. 11.0 [7.9-30.0] min; p = .016). There was no significant difference in contrast use. The presence of bifurcations or valves along the CS course did not influence the procedural timings. CONCLUSION: This study is the first systematic evaluation of CS anatomy and its procedural implications. We identified a favorable C-shape anatomy which allows for a more straightforward implantation. Operators should be aware of the different implications of CS anatomy, their influence on guiding catheter stability and overall procedure complexity.

Vulnerability to cardiac arrest in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: Is it time or patient dependent? Results from a nationwide observational study.

AIM: Cardiac arrest is a common complication of ST elevation myocardial infarction and is associated with high mortality. We evaluated whether vulnerability to cardiac arrest follows a circadian rhythm and whether it is related to specific patient characteristics. METHODS: A total of 24,164 ST elevation myocardial infarction patients who were admitted to 60 Belgian hospitals between 2008-2017 were analysed. The proportion of patients with cardiac arrest before initiation of reperfusion therapy was calculated for different time periods (hour of the day, months, seasons) and related to patient characteristics using stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Cardiac arrest occurred in 10.8% of the ST elevation myocardial infarction patients at a median of 65 min (interquartile range 33-138 min) after onset of pain. ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with cardiac arrest showed a biphasic pattern with one peak in the morning and one peak in the late afternoon. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent factors associated with cardiac arrest: cardiogenic shock (odds ratio=28), left bundle branch block (odds ratio=3.7), short (<180 min) ischaemic period (odds ratio=2.2), post-meridiem daytime presentation (odds ratio=1.4), anterior infarction (odds ratio=1.3). Overall in-hospital mortality was 30% for cardiac arrest patients versus 3.7% for non-cardiac arrest patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the present study population, cardiac arrest in ST elevation myocardial infarction showed an atypical circadian rhythm with not only a morning peak but also a second peak in the late afternoon, suggesting that cardiac arrest and ST elevation myocardial infarction triggers are, at least partially, different. In addition, specific patient characteristics, such as short ischaemic period, cardiogenic shock and left bundle branch block, increase the vulnerability to cardiac arrest.

Is a covered stent justifiable in the treatment of coronary artery perforation? An observational analysis of long-term results of two different covered stent types.

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective observational study, we investigate outcome of patients treated with or without covered stent (CS) implantation in the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: CSs have shown to be effective devices to achieve acute hemostasis in large CAP. However, doubts have been raised regarding their long-term outcome. METHODS: Data of 19 061 PCI procedures during a 10-year period were reviewed. Fifty-five cases of large CAP were withheld (Ellis type 2, 3 or cavity spilling). All medical and procedural records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-four (43.6%) patients were treated with CS implantation (15 polytetrafluoroethylene and 9 pericardium CSs). Twenty-six (47.3%) patients were managed without CS implantation, of whom five had unsuccessful delivery of a CS (stent delivery failure 17.2%). Although significantly more Ellis type-3 perforations were present in the CS group compared to the Non-CS group (75.0% vs 45.2%; P = 0.03), in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (8.3% vs 6.4%; [P = 0.79]). We observed a high rate of CS restenosis (29.2%) but a lower rate of CS thrombosis (4.2%). Despite these observations, 5-year MACE and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between CS and Non-CS group (respectively, 58.8% vs 50.0% (P = 0.26) and 26.7% vs 13.3% (P = 0.36)). CONCLUSION: Although deliverability of CSs was not flawless and a high rate of CS restenosis appeared, short- and long-term outcome were comparable between patients treated with or without CS. Therefore, CSs are justifiable in the treatment of CAP.